Capabilities

How the governance pipeline works.

Three governance engines answer three questions: "does this action satisfy policy?" "does this step still serve the mission?" "is this behavior still consistent?" Each engine evaluates independently. Each seals its findings as evidence. Together they create a single, auditable record of what happened and why.

Checks a single proposed action against your policy, before it executes.

Evaluate

Determine whether a proposed action satisfies your policies before it executes. The same inputs always produce the same result.

Policy evaluationConstraint validationHuman approval
Authorize

Control whether an action is allowed to affect the real world. Any action with no valid sealed record is blocked from executing.

Signed execution tokenSingle use, enforcedSealed regardless of outcome

Checks whether a sequence of already-authorized actions still serves the goal it was given, a workflow's steps or an AI agent's actions alike.

Mission

A stated objective and its constraints, sealed as the reference every action in the session gets checked against.

ObjectiveConstraintsCompletion conditions
Assess

Judge one observed action against the mission: on_track, drifting, off_mission, or cannot_determine, computed fresh every time, never cached from an earlier verdict.

Independent judgmentPluggable evaluatorSealed assessment
React

A consumer, a supervisor, a workflow engine, a human reviewer, decides what the assessment means: continue, replan, or stop. Mission Governance never decides this itself.

Continue / replan / stopConsumer-defined policySame contract for any consumer

Checks whether a session of already-authorized actions still behaves like itself, a workflow's steps or an AI agent's session alike.

Compare

Measure a session against its own earlier pattern, across independent behavioral signals.

Session-scopedIndependent signalsNo fixed threshold
Disposition

Continue, advisory, or hold. A description of behavioral continuity. Each action stays separately authorized either way.

Continue / advisory / holdDescriptive onlyNo opinion on the response
Consume

One assessment, exported once. An agent reads it as a reflection prompt, a human reads it in a panel, a CI pipeline reads it before a merge. Each consumer decides on its own what to do with it.

AgentHumanCI/CDWorkflow engineTelemetry

Every governed execution produces independently verifiable evidence. Whether it was a single approval, a workflow spanning dozens of steps, or an autonomous agent operating for hours, Singradura seals what happened so it can be reconstructed and verified years later.

Replay

Run the same execution again through the original rules and produce the same result, byte for byte. Deterministic outcomes prove nothing has changed.

Deterministic executionSame inputs = same outputYears later
Verify

Anyone can independently validate the evidence. No access to Singradura required. No special tools required. The evidence is self-contained and portable.

Independent validationPortable recordAuditor access
Audit

Reconstruct exactly why the decision happened. When a regulator asks, show them the sealed record. When you need to explain a choice, replay it. The evidence is the answer.

Root cause analysisRegulatory proofHistorical record
Start a pilot How it's deployed